Victor's Life Journal
travel log, pictures, personal finance, news and ramblings

Engineering

American railroad tracks are 56.5" wide (the "gauge") because the
English built the first railroads in America and they used that width.
Why did they use that width? Because the first rail lines were built by
the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the
gauge they used. Why did "they" use that gauge then? Because the people
who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that were used for
building wagons which used that wheel spacing.

Why did wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Because older
wagon ruts throughout England used that spacing, and if they changed it,
wagon wheels would break by either falling into or being forced out of
the old ruts, which were 56.5" wide.

The old ruts were that size because the roads were built by the Romans,
who arrived in England in 54 BC and left about 400 AD. Their wagons, and
their chariots before their wagons, used that spacing, and that spacing
was used all over Europe and wherever Rome conquered, because their
wagons used the identical wheel base everywhere. So the modern railroad
track width derives from the Roman chariot.

Why was the Roman chariot track width 56.5"? Because that was the width
of a chariot that would equal the width of two "standard" Roman horses.
Thus, wagon and horses would fit through the same narrow street.
Specifications and bureaucracies live forever!


Such curious dimensions continue today. A space shuttle sitting on its
launch pad has two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main
fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs, made by Thiokol at
their factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs might have
preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by
train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the
factory had to run through a tunnel in the mountains. The SRBs had to
fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is just wide enough to accommodate a
railroad car, and the railroad track is about as wide as two horses'
behinds, (and we now know why) so the booster rockets were made to fit.

The major design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced
transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the
width of a horse's ass!

Wedding Registries

M and I have 8 weddings to attend this year, along with a heap of
associated bridal showers. Yesterday we went to The Bay armed with 6
registries (the 6 of the 8 that had registries at The Bay) with a plan
to do the bulk of our shopping in one fell swoop. Actually, it went
quite well - well enough that we were done in about 2.5 hours. We had a
tremendous amount of help from two sales associates (who I just sent a
thank you letter to). Without them I think we would still be there going
through SKUs.

A rant on registries: I've never created a registry, but based on what
we saw yesterday, it must be really easy to get carried away. Our
friends, who we generally consider to be rational people, almost without
exception had items on their registry that I would not buy (ever)
regardless of how much money I had. Furthermore, if I was the type to
enjoy fancy and decorative things, I still don't think I'd feel right
having these top of the line items given to me - I'd expect to work hard
and perhaps one day purchase them myself. As a group of newish grads, I
would not expect my also new grad friends to buy me a $190 platter.
That's just nuts. Slash rant.

Innovage Mini Digital Camera

http://www.overstock.com/

Last week I bought two of these at a garage sale for 10 cents. I now
have one set up at work as a webcam. I'll keep the other in the car for
emergencies.

Earth Day Doom and Gloom

Earth Day Report by Captain Paul Watson
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watson

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955)

Earth Day is almost here. I don't believe in Earth Day myself. I think it's a little silly to devote one single day of the year to being concerned about the environment, but I suppose one day is better than no day at all.

Having been an environmental activist since 1968, I have seen the movement go up and down like a roller coaster in popularity. It was big in 1972 with the Environmental Conference in Stockholm which I attended and it became big again in 1992 with the U.N. Environmental Conference in Rio De Janeiro that I also attended. I remember that the priority issue in 1972 was the danger of escalating human populations but by 1992, that concern was not even on the agenda.

Well we are approaching the end of another 20 year period and it looks like ecology is in vogue again thanks to global warming and a few other scary things. Green is once again popular.

I can always tell when the environment is getting to be faddish again. My indicator is the number of lectures I am booked for around this time of year. It reached its peak in 1992, practically disappeared for awhile and now it's coming around again.

What worries me is that the movement is constantly being sidetracked by the issue of the day.

It's global warming now. When we were trying to warn people about global warming and climate change twenty years ago, no one was interested. Now it's become the "in" issue and the big organizations are tapping the public for donations to address the problem although no one has come up with anything that makes much sense. But global warming is good for business if you're one of the big bureaucratic organizations whose primary concern is really corporate self preservation.

Greenpeace is even telling people that they can slow down global warming by (and I kid you not) "singing in the shower". Yep, you see all you have to do is run the water, then get wet, shut the water off, and sing in the shower as you lather up and then open up the faucet and rinse off. Ah, so simple to save the world.

The problem is that these big organizations are too politically correct to address the ecologically correct solutions.

Instead they are baffling everyone with abstract concepts like carbon trading and carbon storage or trying to sell us a new hybrid Japanese car.

Even Al Gore with his Inconvenient Truth totally ignored the most inconvenient truth of all. I'll get to that in a moment.

But let's look at the number one cause of global greenhouse gas emissions.

First and foremost it is human over-population, the very same issue that was the priority concern at the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Environment in Stockholm.

It's 6.5 billion people folks.

Remember in 1950, the world population was 3 billion. It's now more than doubled.

6.5 billion people produce one hell of an annual output of waste and utilize an unbelievable amount of resources and energy.

And this number is rising minute by minute, day, by day, year by year.

And most of the people having children have no idea why they are even having children other than that's what you do. Most of them don't really love their children because if they did they would be very much involved in trying to ensure that their children have a world to survive in.

Unless over-population is addressed, there is absolutely no way of slowing down global greenhouse gas emissions.

But how do you do that within the context of economic systems that require larger and larger numbers to perform the essential task of consuming products?

Corporations need workers and buyers. Governments need tax-payers, bureaucrats and soldiers. More people means more money.

I've said for decades that the solution to all of our problems is simple. We just need to live in accordance with the three basic laws of ecology.

First is the Law of Diversity. The strength of an eco-system lies in diversity of species within it. Weaken diversity and the entire system will be weakened and will ultimately collapse.

Second is the Law of Interdependence. All of the species within an eco-system are interdependent. We need each other.

And the third law of Ecology is the Law of Finite Resources. There is a limit to growth because there is a limit to carrying capacity.

Human populations are exceeding ecological carrying capacity.

Exceeding ecological carrying capacity is diminishing both resources and diversity of species.

The diminishment of diversity is causing serious problems with interdependence.

Albert Einstein once wrote that "if the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe, then man would have only four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man."

That is the Law of Interdependence.

Forget global warming folks. The disappearance of the honeybee could end our existence as human beings on this planet far sooner than we think.

And the honey bee is in fact now disappearing. Why? We don't know why. It could be genetically modified crops, It could be pesticides or it could be that our cell phones are interfering with their ability to navigate.

Whatever the cause the fact is that they are disappearing. All around the world bees are disappearing in a crisis called Colony Collapse Disorder.

And bees pollinate our plants. Everywhere on the planet, bees are hard at work making it possible for you to live and enjoy life.

We hold on to our place on this planet by only a toehold. If anything happens to the grass family, we are screwed. If the earthworms disappear, we are in big trouble. If the bees disappear, well according to Albert Einstein who was considered somewhat smarter than most of us, we will have only four years. Just enough time to get a college degree to discover that everything you learned is relatively useless when sitting on the doorstep of global ecological annihilation.

We are cutting down the forest and plundering the oceans of life. We are polluting the soil, the air and the water and we are rapidly running out of fresh water to drink.

Only corporations like Coke and Pepsi have figured out that water is more valuable than gold. That is why they are bottling it in plastic bottles and selling it. This week I saw a bottle of water in my hotel room that I could have drunk for only $4.

Unbelievable. That means that water is now being sold for more than the equivalent amount of gasoline. I hope that I'm not the only one who thinks this is insanity.

Now for Al Gore's really inconvenient truth. In his film he does not mention once that the meat and dairy industry that produces the bacon, the steaks, the chicken wings and the milk is a larger contributor to greenhouse gas emissions than the automobile industry. You see, Al may drive a Prius but he likes his burgers.

This is why the big organizations like Greenpeace and the Sierra Club will not say a thing about the meat industry. Last year I saw Greenpeacers sitting down for a baked fish meal onboard the Greenpeace ship Esperanza while engaged in a campaign to oppose over-fishing.

When we pointed out that our Sea Shepherd ships serve only vegan meals, the Greenpeace cook replied, "that's just silly."

We see what we want to see and we rationalize everything else.

The oceans have been plundered to the point that 90% of the fish have been removed from their eco-systems and at this very moment there is over 65,000 miles of long lines set in the Pacific Ocean alone and there are tens of thousands of fishing vessels scouring the seas in a rapacious quest to scoop up everything that swims or crawls.

This is ecological insanity.

The largest marine predator on the planet right now is the cow. More than half the fish taken from the sea is rendered into fish meal and fed to domestic livestock. Puffins are starving in the North sea to feed sand eels to chickens in Denmark. Sheep and pigs have replaced the shark and the sea lion as the dominant predators in the ocean and domestic house cats are eating more fish than all the world's seals combined. We are extracting some fifty to sixty fish from the sea to raise one farm reared salmon.

This is ecological insanity.

Yet the demand for shark fin is rising in China. Ignorant people still want to wear fur coats. In America, we order fries, a cheeseburger and a "diet" coke.

Ecological insanity folks.

Last week a reporter called to ask me if I had really said that earth worms are more important than people. I answered that yes I had. He then asked how I could justify such a statement.

"Simple," I answered. "Earthworms can live on the planet without people. We cannot live on the planet without earthworms thus from an ecological point of view, earthworms are more important than people."

He said that I was insane for suggesting such a ridiculous idea when people were made in the image of God, and earthworms were not.

What we have here of course is a failure to communicate between two radically different world views. His which is anthropocentric and sees reality as human centred and mine which is biocentric and sees reality as including all species equally working in interdependence. He sees us as divine and better than all the other species and I see us as a bunch of arrogant primates out of control.

But that's my two cents worth for Earth Day 2007.

Consider the humble honey bee and remember that the little black and yellow insect you see flitting busily from flower to flower is all that stands between us and our demise as a species on this planet.

We better see to it that they don't disappear.

May be freely published and distributed

Captain Paul Watson

Founder and President of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (1977-
Co-Founder - The Greenpeace Foundation (1972)
Co-Founder - Greenpeace International (1979)
Director of the Sierra Club USA (2003-2006)
Director - The Farley Mowat Institute
Director - www.harpseals.org

Letter to the Oakville Beaver Newspaper

To whom it may concern at the Oakville Beaver:

I'm writing today as a resident of Oakville concerned with reducing the environmental impact of our community. As someone who takes great pride in being involved in his community, I try to stay informed about the happenings in Oakville. I've found that reading the Oakville beaver online has proven to be one of the most effective ways to do this.My concern is with the Oakville Beaver's practice of delivering their newspaper to all Oakville residents by default. In the past I have tried numerous times to unsubscribe from this service yet still receive the paper, albeit only on occasion. To that end, I have drafted a letter (attached as a Word document) that could be delivered as part of the next newspaper delivery. This would allow residents to 'opt-out' of this free service. Please feel free to use or modify this letter in any way you see fit.

First, I'm realistic enough to know that the likelihood that you will choose to send out this letter is very low. However, I felt that at the very least this letter would raise awareness with your staff that such concerns exist in the community. I humbly request that you at least read it. Perhaps you could consider something as simple as "No Oakville Beaver Delivery Please" stickers for mailboxes.Second, I'm aware that with any business the bottom line is the most important line. For that reason, I'll present you a financially-advantageous reason to send out this letter. Sending out this letter would allow you to tell potential advertisers that, unlike most local publications, each and every recipient of your newspaper chose to receive it. Thus, an unusually high percentage of those recipients actually read the paper and consequently are exposed to the advertisements. Focused advertising is a huge selling point, evident in the rates paid by advertisers for focused magazines compared to general-audience newspapers on a per-subscription basis.

Realistically, I think we can all agree that there are a large number of papers that are delivered and end up in the trash or recycling bin without even having been unrolled. There is a fair bit of apathy about local issues; there was only a 35% voter turnout in the last Oakville municipal election. Then there are those who prefer to stay abreast of national or international news, but are not concerned with local issues. I would hate to see the Oakville Beaver disappear - I think it's a wonderful pillar of this community. However, I just don't think the paper should be delivered by default to everyone with no easy option to unsubscribe.

If you wish, please feel free to contact me at this email address or my phone at 905-xxx-xxxx.

Thank you for your time!

---

The text of the letter:

Dear resident of Oakville,

At the Oakville Beaver, we understand that while many Oakville residents may enjoy our newspaper’s content, there may be others who are not interested in receiving copies of our newspaper. In an effort to potentially reduce the amount of paper used by the Oakville Beaver, we are leaving a copy of this letter at every household that currently receives free copies of our newspaper.

The Oakville Beaver is published three times weekly by Metroland Media Group. The paper covers topics of particular interest to Oakville residents including local political, sports, arts and business news as well jobs and classified ads. The Oakville Beaver has won the prestigious General Excellence Award in the top circulation class in the Ontario Community Newspaper Association's Better Newspapers competition every year since 2006. The paper can be read online at no cost at the following address: http://www.oakvillebeaver.com/.

The other side of this coin is that “manufacturing one ton of newsprint, which is enough to create approximately 280,000 broadsheet pages, requires the contents of twelve mature trees.” A bit less than half of the paper used by the average North American newspaper comes from recycled paper. Most paper used by newspapers originates in “the Canadian Boreal Forest; according to Forest Ethics, a Canadian non-governmental organization, clearcutting is the preferred technique in these regions.”

Once the logging is complete, the most energy-intensive phase of the process begins. According to Sweden's Royal Institute of Technology, “newsprint production accounts for roughly two-thirds of a paper's energy consumption”. Wood pulping is reputedly the dirtiest part of the process. The US Department of Energy estimates that “the paper manufacturing industry is that nation's fourth-largest emitter of carbon dioxide, trailing only the chemical, petroleum and coal, and primary metals industries.” Finally, all that paper must be trucked to stores, newsstands and homes, then back to be recycled or landfilled. The end result is that according to a British 2006 report, “a single copy of the British tabloid the Daily Mirror, weighing in at 6.4 ounces, accounts for 6.1 ounces of carbon emissions.”

In order to inform us of your decision regarding the free delivery of the Oakville Beaver to your home, please check one of the following boxes and leave this letter in your mailbox before your next Oakville Beaver delivery date.

- I would like to continue my free biweekly subscription to the Oakville Beaver

- Please stop delivering the Oakville Beaver to my home

Thank you for your time!

Bullfrog Power

Dear Victor,

Congratulations! Your switch to Bullfrog Power™ occurs today and your home is now bullfrogpowered!

We are happy to report that the reaction of Canadians to Bullfrog Power has been tremendous and we appreciate your leadership in making the choice for 100% green electricity. You are joining other Canadians such as Gord Downie from the Tragically Hip and author Margaret Atwood in your personal support of Bullfrog Power. Many organizations including Wal-Mart Canada, Cadbury-Adams, RBC Financial Group, and World Wildlife Fund Canada have also chosen to support clean renewables with Bullfrog Power.

Please note that you will still receive a bill from your previous provider for the electricity you used up to today’s date, so do not be surprised when it arrives on your doorstep. You should receive your first Bullfrog Power bill on your next billing period, which could be another two months from now.

Thank you again for your support of clean renewable power, and welcome to the community of bullfrogpowered homes!

Regards,

Customer Service

Bullfrog Power Inc.
119 Spadina Avenue Suite 1000
Toronto ON M5V 2L1

T: 416-360-3464 x1
F: 416-360-8385
E:
customerservice@bullfrogpower.com
W:
www.bullfrogpower.com

Operation Clear Blue

http://www.operationclearblue.bravehost.com/

This is EXACTLY the kind of idea I was talking about in my letter about beer and wine bottles!

Entitlement

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/news/0805/gallery.real_people_gas/index.html

As I read these stories, I'm struck by the sense of entitlement coming through load and clear from each case study. Rising gas prices are causing some people to cut back in various areas, but they are cutting back to levels still WAY above what most of the world lives at.

Morally Bankrupt

An older story I thought about this morning on my bike ride to work…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chante_Jawan_Mallard

In 2001, this woman had four drinks and two types of drugs at a party before driving home. On the way, she struck a homeless man (Greg Biggs) who became lodged in her windshield. Instead of stopping and calling 911 or driving to a hospital, she instead chose to drive home and hide her car in the garage. “She then went inside, had sex with her boyfriend, and over the next day or so checked on the man still stuck in her windshield.” Biggs took somewhere between several hours and two dies to die, and during this time pleaded with Mallard to take him to a hospital. She ignored him.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819196/posts

Her two friends (Clete Denel Jackson and Herbert Tyrone Cleveland) helped her dump the body in a park a few days later and set fire to the vehicle to attempt to hide the evidence. They were also charged and jailed. Mallard herself was convicted and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment. In the words of one poster:

“I cannot imagine more morally bankrupt people than these who would let a human suffer to such a degree and not show any remorse.”

Idiocracy-style evidence:

“Mallard became a suspect after she was reported talking about the incident at a party some four months after the events. ‘I hit this white man,’ Mallard allegedly told Daniel, laughing.”

“Jackson, who was [already] facing up to 20 years in prison because he had a prior felony conviction, was sentenced to 10 years in the penitentiary.”

“Afterward, the judge allowed Jackson to visit for a moment with his only supporter in the courtroom, Kerah Scranton, his ex-wife and the mother of four of his nine children.”

“The Tarrant County district attorney's office also agreed not to prosecute Jackson's girlfriend, Raini Dae Ellingson, who was facing perjury charges because of inconsistencies in her statements about the case to a grand jury and at bond reduction hearing.”

And just to prove how slimy some lawyers can be:

“She panicked and made a bad decision … but it has been blown out of proportion.”

Global Village

If the world were shrunk to the size of a village of 100 people with all
existing ratios remaining the same, what would it look like?

59 would be Asian
14 would be American (North, Central and South)
14 would be African
12 would be European
1 would be from the South Pacific

50 would be women, 50 would be men
30 would be children, 70 would be adults.
70 would be nonwhite, 30 would be white
90 would be heterosexual, 10 would be homosexual

33 would be Christians
21 would be Moslems
15 would be Hindus
6 would be Buddhists
5 would be Animists
6 would believe in other religions
14 would be without any religion or atheist

15 would speak Chinese or Mandarin
7 English
6 Hindi
6 Spanish
5 Russian
4 Arabic
3 Bengali
3 Portuguese
The other would speak Indonesian, Japanese, German, French, or some
other language.

20 are undernourished
1 is dying of starvation, while 15 are overweight
Of the wealth in this village, 6 people own 59% (all of them from the
United States), 74 people own 39%, and 20 people share the remaining 2%
Of the energy of this village, 20 people consume 80%, and 80 people
share the remaining 20%
20 have no clean, safe water to drink
56 have access to sanitation
15 adults are illiterate
1 has an university degree
7 have computers

In one year, 1 person in the village will die, but in the same year, 2
babies will be born, so that at the year's end the number of villagers
will be 101

If you do not live in fear of death by bombardment, armed attack,
landmines, or of rape or kidnapping by armed groups, then you are more
fortunate than 20, who do

If you can speak and act according to your faith and your conscience
without harassment, imprisonment, torture or death, then you are more
fortunate than 48, who can not

If you have money in the bank, money in your wallet and spare change
somewhere around the house, then you are among the richest 8

If you can read this message, that means you are probably lucky!

(The statistics were derived from Donella Meadows "State of the Village
Report" first published in 1990)

http://www.miniature-earth.com/me_english.htm

Space Tourism

"…tourism is fat guys with cameras."
        - Alex Tabarrok

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism

Does anybody feel like lending me $200 000?

If You Don't Do it, Nobody Else Will

From: http://www.jstor.org/pss/2095418

It is commonly assumed that people participate more in collective action when they believe others will. But local activists often say: "I did it because nobody else would." Investigation of the differences among 1456 Detroit residents who were nonmembers, token members, or active members (either currently active or past leaders) of their neighborhood associations reveals that active members were significantly more pessimistic than token members about the prospects for neighborhood collective action, a finding explained by recent theoretical work on collective action by Oliver et al. (1984). Other findings are that active members are more highly educated than token members; that past leaders know more people and have higher interest in local problems; and that currently active members have more close ties in the neighborhood, like the neighborhood less, and are less likely to be homeowners. Contrasts between members and nonmembers are similar to those found in previous research.

Im looking for anything that explains in detail the logical fallacy of the statement if I dont do this, someone else will that engineers often use to justify working on immoral projects or for immoral companies.



    Click here for older entries...